Create Quizzes from YouTube Videos Automatically with Quizizz

It just got a whole lot easier to check student comprehension of video content. But does this feature actually support student learning?

*Note: I have no affiliation with Quizizz.

Education technology has been quiet for a while, it feels like. But something pretty exciting has appeared in the online quiz game space.

Online quiz platforms have come a long way

First, let’s zoom out and give this category of education apps some context.

The iconic Kahoot first appeared in 2013. Can you believe that?

Since then, it feels like it’s ruled the review quiz space, by and large.

Everyone knows Kahoot.

But other apps and companies have also appeared over the years, and each one boasts interesting features that the others do not. Even as Kahoot slowly evolves forward and adds its own features, teachers can now choose from Blooket, Gimkit, Quizizz, or Quizlet.

I can’t profess to be a high-level expert on the ins and outs of every platform. A side-by-side comparison of each one (including differences between free and premium plans) would be fun.

Perhaps edtech author, speaker, and podcaster Jake Miller could tackle that little project. Jake?

New from Quizizz: AI-created quizzes from selected YouTube videos

In the meantime, I can tell you this.

Quizizz is putting artificial intelligence to work for teachers.

Quizizz now allows teachers to create review quizzes automatically from any YouTube video (provided it has captions, including auto-captions, which most videos do).

Drop the YouTube link and watch Quizizz do its magic.

Wow.

But Quizizz isn’t done.

It can also apply the same quiz-making skills to any .PDF, .Doc, or .PPT file.

Want to paste in a big body of text?

No problem. It can do that, too.

For FREE. As of the time of writing, you could perform this magic from a Basic account.

Time to test this YouTube-video-to-automatic-quiz feature out

I was skeptical at first. There’s no way this can work quickly and well, I thought.

Turns out it can.

I tested Quizizz on two YouTube videos. The first video was from fifth grade Social Studies, related to the government structures. The second was from sixth grade Science, related to Isaac Newton’s three laws of motion.

Both were short videos (under three minutes), so I knew the Quizizz AI wasn’t getting a huge amount of text from which to formulate questions.

It didn’t struggle at all. Ten decent multiple choice questions and answers for each video.

But does this feature actually support student learning?

Hold on, Cavey. Let’s make sure we’re not just rushing after the latest shiny object.

All-important is this question: does this app or feature support student learning? If so, how?

I think it does, although not in profoundly significant ways. Here’s what I mean.

Let’s take the second video that I tested in Quizizz — Newton’s Laws of Motion (Motion, Force, Acceleration).

I might show that video in connection with a learning target (derived from our sixth grade Science curriculum) that looked like this:

🎯 I can define and identify Newton’s three laws of motion.

Quizizz had no problem spitting out 10 decent multiple choice questions based on this short video (2:37). Bravo!

But let’s talk about depth of knowledge for a second. Even if a student scored a 10/10 on my little quiz (and note that I don’t record any numbers in my gradebook whatsoever), would I consider that evidence of full proficiency?

I’m not so sure that I would.

I would want more evidence. Better quality evidence. Other kinds of representations of this learning that require a little more from the learner and demonstrate greater depth of knowledge.

The same goes for all of these review platforms. We don’t take student results from Blooket or Kahoot and throw them in our gradebook. Right?

Hmmm.

Three nice wins from this feature

Here’s where I think these AI-powered features really add to the teaching and learning experience.

1. They will give teachers another source of formative assessment.

Wondering if your students are grasping the basics of Newton’s three laws? Your quiz results will give you a decent signal.

Will student scores give you a rock-solid picture of the depth of their understanding? As I wrote above, no. Will they help? Yes, particularly on a macro (whole-class) level.

2. They will increase student engagement.

It’s my anecdotal observation of middle schoolers that when multiple choice quizzes come out, most students come to play.

They’re engaged. They’re focused. They’re aiming to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding.

And because of that fact, I know I’ll also get higher engagement when I show the video itself. Simply by saying with a smile “And I’ve got a 10-question quiz to follow, so pay close attention!” I know students will be more engaged.

Am I leveraging performance anxiety to increase engagement? I don’t think so. I mean, I don’t even record numbers in my gradebooks. None at all.

And it should go without saying that I’m not going to embarrass or humiliate a student for a poor showing.

All I’m trying to do here is press a little button that says I care about your comprehension of this material, and because I care, I’d like to see some evidence.

That knowledge alone is enough to activate more attention and interest in most students.

3. They will save teachers time.

In 2023, teacher sustainability is everything. Seriously.

As we ask more from teachers than ever before, we have to have to have to find ways to save teachers time and energy.

This feature is one way to do it. A year ago, it probably took your average teacher 20–30 minutes to make a review quiz on one of these platforms.

No more. Powered by some awesome AI, Quizizz will do it for teachers in a matter of seconds. That’s a welcome savings.

Final thoughts on Quizizz AI

I’m excited about this step forward for review games, and I’m 95% sure it’s not just the nerdy technophile side of me speaking.

These quizzes will save teachers time, increase student engagement, and give teachers another source of formative assessment that will guide their next instructional decisions.

And it’s FREE. Did I mention that?

If you’re new to Quizizz but want to give it a try, check my latest edtech tutorial.

Should Teachers Use This New Google Classroom Feature?

Does ‘Close submissions after due date’ support student learning and development?

Google Classroom recently introduced a new feature in assignment settings. Teachers can now select ‘Close submissions after due date.’

I have no doubt that some teachers reacted warmly to this development. Late assignment submissions drive some teachers mad. They cost time and energy.

So the ability to shut the door on late submissions is an appealing option.

But just because the option is there doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the right course for student learning.

Whenever it comes to tricky pedagogical, policy, or program decisions, I like to fall back on these two questions:

Is this good for kids?
Is this good for student learning?

Guided by this simple filter and after giving this some serious thought, here’s where I’m landing on Google Classroom’s newest feature for now.

Four thoughts on the ‘Close submissions after due date’ option

1. If our number one mission is student learning, I would hope that our posture is that whenever students want to submit evidence of their learning, we want to accept it.

We can’t always, but we want to or we wish we could, right?

That’s a very general principle that requires qualifications (see points 3–4 regarding teacher limitations and sustainability), but I think if our mission is truly student learning, it’s important to at least aim for that posture as a starting point.

If students want to show us evidence of their learning, as a general default we’d like to see it, or at the very least have access to it.

2. I sure hope we’re not leveraging that feature in order to scare students into assignment completion and submission.

Please, no.

If we’re checking the box beside this option, we’d better be thinking through our policy carefully. If an assignment was due on Tuesday and the student wants to submit it on Wednesday but is shut out by this setting, what happens next?

Because I’ll tell you one thing we’re definitely NOT doing.

We’re not recording zeros for unsubmitted work. Zeros obliterate any remnants of possible meaning or significance from report cards.

As Tom Schimmer says, if an athlete doesn’t show up for a 100 meter dash, we don’t assume they have zero running ability.

That would be intellectual laziness. No one in the track world would treat that as a serious conclusion.

If an athlete doesn’t show up for a race, it means that we simply don’t have the evidence that we need to properly assess their running ability.

Unless we have access to other data, their ability to run 100 meters remains completely unknown.

In my proficiency scale (standards-based grading) context, we’re also not going to record a student’s learning as Emerging. That would be the same idea as a zero.

Remember, if we’re recording zeroes or assessments of Emerging proficiency, we’re no longer trying to honestly measure learning against curricular standards.

All we’re doing is leveraging grades as punishment and rewards.

And that makes our gradebooks a joke, because now the grade says more about compliance than ability.

3. I would hope that if we use this feature, we use it in a way that opens the door to student conversations and growth.

Maybe there’s a simple conversation or appeal or application process that the student must complete in order to be allowed to submit their assignment.

Whatever this looks like, I can see some positive potential here. Some character and regulation formation in the student. Some deepening of the teacher-student relationship.

Note that this will actually require more time and energy from the teacher than if the feature was not turned on. But if a teacher is willing to go this path, I applaud them.

Seriously, they’re a rock star. They’re deeply invested.

Student learning, development, and self-regulation skills could win as a result of this kind of policy.

4. The reality we can all agree on: teachers are limited by time and human capacity.

Teachers already cannot assess every piece of work that students touch.

When we do find the time and priority to assess student work, it needs to be done as much as possible in one chunk, one session.

What I’m getting at here is that teachers simply cannot sit down to assess 15 submissions, then a few days later assess three more, then a few days later one more, then a few days later three more.

Extrapolate that kind of ridiculousness across dozens of students and learning activities and you’ve got a great recipe for teacher insanity or depression or both.

We also quite literally cannot accept submissions forever.

The end of term or semester is generally a hard cap, but even within the term, it’s not reasonable for teachers to assess submissions in November that were due in September.

So for that reason I think there’s at least an argument to be made for closing the door on learning activities and moving on at some point.

Privately, I would hope that the door on submissions doesn’t slam shut at midnight on the due date. Google Classroom does offer a switch that blocks future submissions at any arbitrary time, so teachers could do this manually a week or so after due dates if they chose.

But let’s be real and say that ultimately, the door on submissions does have to close at some point.

Will I use this feature?

No.

One of my core values as a teacher has long been this: late is better than never. As long as the assignment submission is there for me by the time I assess it, we’re good.

For me to shut the door quickly on assignment submissions, I have to be able to make the reverse case: never is better than late.

That’s a very, very tough position to defend pedagogically.

But should all teachers go my way? Not necessarily.

As I wrote in point 3 (above), I can see a best use case for this feature that results in increased learning, character formation, and self-regulation skills in students.

It would take a serious commitment on the part of teachers. It would cost them more time and energy, and as a part-time administrator I worry about that.

But for teachers willing to take this strategy seriously, I can see the potential wins. And I’ll cheer you on as you do it.

Warn Your Teaching Teammates Before Doing the Fun Stuff

A quick heads up shows respect for your teammates and protects team unity.

Photo Source: Scholastic.com

I just know that some teacher out there is going to look at this title and ask “Why can’t all of your learning be fun?”

Come on. Let’s be real for a second.

Yes, we always want learning to be fun.

We bring the hype and the noise and the smiles and the interactivity and the creativity and the technology and the gamification whenever and wherever we can.

But the reality of your typical classroom is that students aren’t calling it fun every single minute of every day, even if they like you, they’re grateful for the class, and they’re glad to be there.

You can live in denial of that fact or you can accept it. It’s a fact.

By “fun activities,” I’m talking about the Big Fun Deals, or BFDs. The stuff students talk about in the hallways.

The crazy review games. The slurpee treats. The movies. The mind-blowing projects. The spontaneous walks outside of the school. The potluck lunches. The pizza parties. Dance-offs. Ice cream sundaes.

There can be times and places for all of those things. But let me give you this tip: give your teaching team a heads up before doing them.

This is my 23rd year of teaching, and I’ve been on both sides of this equation.

Sometimes I’ve been the teacher suddenly doing a Big Fun Deal with my students.

Sometimes I’ve been the neighbor teacher who is doing “normal stuff” while the classroom next door suddenly explodes with loud music, smells of pizza, and roars of laughter for an entire block.

Not every class will always be doing the exact same thing at the exact same time, even within a grade level. That’s just school life.

And some teachers will ultimately become known as “the fun teacher.” More power to them. Those reputations are generally earned through consistent sacrifice, kindness, smiles, laughter, and emotional generosity.

Just give them a heads up first

But the point of the post is this: when you’re planning a Big Fun Deal in your room, give your teaching teammates a bit of a warning.

That gives them a chance to mentally prepare. To plan a similar version of your Big Fun Deal. Or even to join in on it.

It’s not to say that if they don’t have the advance notice, catastrophe will follow. Not at all. They may be totally cool with your BFD and simply encourage their own students to carry on with whatever their planned learning activity is at the time.

They may cheer you on and that is that.

But the other possibility is that they may feel sideswiped. Like you’re trying to one-up them. Like you’re trying to carve out a lane as Hero Teacher by carefully crafting your Big Fun Deal out of sight so that they can’t take part or they’re left looking boring.

That may not have been your intention at all, but that’s how it can come across.

This message doesn’t come from any recent experience — just a couple of decades in the biz.

If unity and cohesion is important to you and your teaching team — and I sure hope it is — keep your colleagues in the know.

And then lean into that Big Fun Deal like it’s 1999.

How to Make an Awesome Scoreboard in Canva

The Magic and Misery of Student Video Submissions

Allowing students to represent their learning through video creates exciting possibilities and serious challenges to our sanity at the same time.

Image Source: Apple

I’m a big believer in allowing our students to represent their learning in as many different ways as possible.

Writing is the conventional means for this, and don’t dump on it. Effective writing is as powerful and important as ever, says this English major.

The keyboard is still mightier than the sword, notwithstanding the trolls.

But students can also represent their learning through drawings, posters, brochures, magazines, slideshows, animations, group presentations, speeches, plays, audio recordings, and a host of other expressions.

They can also use video recordings.

The magic of video submissions

When I started teaching in 2001, there was no way for students to represent their learning through video and share it effectively.

We didn’t have iPads or Chromebooks back then. We didn’t even have wifi.

By comparison, students and teachers of today have an embarrassment of riches at our disposal. Using tools like Seesaw and Canva, students can record picture-in-picture videos or screencasts that include explanations and demonstrations of their learning.

There are probably hundreds of specific applications of video in the classroom, but here are three of my current favorites:

1. Writing piece read-alouds

Any time my English students complete a piece of writing of any significance, I ask them to read it aloud on Seesaw in the form of a screen recording. By zooming in on their text (usually a Google Doc) as they read, students allow their parents to follow along on their own devices while they listen to their child.

This practice is such a no-brainer for any middle school language classroom. It positions students to truly own their writing, refine and revise their texts (they always discover mistakes when they read them aloud), and strengthen their oral communication skills — another important curricular standard.

2. Video reflections after independent reading

Our students sometimes feel like every time they turn around, they’re writing another reflection. I think reflections are good practice for lots of reasons, but we can also mix it up a little bit. They don’t always need to be typed or written, and students generally appreciate the change-up.

Here’s an activity from my Seesaw library that I can re-post in a few clicks after any independent reading period. It meets curricular standards, requires critical thinking, strengthens oral communication skills, and provides some gentle accountability.

Wins all around.

3. Math solution demonstrations as screencasts

When I’m teaching Math, I like to ask students to demonstrate their solution to a problem as a narrated screen recording.

This gives me so much more information than simply “Did they find the right answer?” I can watch, listen, track their understanding and observe their whole process. Depth of proficiency is all right there.

The video becomes another helpful artifact in their learning journal. And the student’s parents can see precisely where their child’s learning is, too.

It’s a thing of beauty.

The misery of video submissions

Now it’s time to face the bitter truth about video submissions.

They take forever to fully review.

FOREVER.

I taught 160 unique middle school students each semester this year as part of my 60% teaching time. (We’ll stay focused today and ignore the fact that my 40% admin time took up about 80% of my energy.)

Let’s say that in the course of one week, I assigned each of my 160 students a learning activity that required submission of a video. (I know the UDL advocates will speak up to say that I should be offering more choices for means of representation, but work with me, folks.)

Let’s say that each of those 160 students submits a video that averages three minutes in length. That’s eight hours of viewing.

Now I know I don’t have to watch every single video in its entirety, but you see my point. When you put those hours beside all my other teaching and administrative duties, the time quickly becomes impossible. Absurd, even.

Some of my dear students sincerely expect me to watch every second of everything they post. Bless their hearts, but I can’t meet that demand and stay sane at the same time.

What are we to do?

Should we just give up and avoid video submissions altogether?

The good news about video activities

Thankfully, I bring you glad tidings of great joy, tired teacher. We don’t have to grade everything. We don’t have to offer feedback on everything, either.

I first encountered this word of hope from Dylan Wiliam and Siobhan Leahy in Embedding Formative Assessment:

“The most important takeaway from the research is that the shorter the time interval between eliciting the evidence and using it to improve instruction, the bigger the likely impact on learning.”

I draw three conclusions from this quote, and friend, they are important.

1. The feedback I offer my students in real time has the greatest impact of any feedback they receive.

This is as true on the basketball court or in the band room as it is in my English classroom. So I engage, interact, look over shoulders, sit with students, observe what they’re doing, ask questions, offer feedback, and support their learning whenever and wherever I can during class time.

2. The feedback I offer my students hours or days or even weeks after the fact isn’t too valuable.

You know those five hours you spent last Saturday posting feedback on student work? Not a great return on your investment, research suggests.

That’s not to say that we should never offer feedback or grade student work long after the time of completion. I do so when it seems important to, especially when I’m relying on particular pieces of evidence of learning to construct an accurate picture of a student’s progress.

But I weigh my investment of attention and energy against the time that has elapsed since the student completed the work. The greater the gap, the less impact my feedback or assessment is likely to have on their learning.

3. Learning activities can often support student learning, even without feedback or assessment from the teacher.

Look at the three examples of video submissions that I listed above. I would argue that each and every one is valuable for the student to complete, whether or not I offer feedback or assess the activity.

Yes, sometimes I will offer feedback during class or after it. But other times I can’t and won’t. And that’s okay, because the student is still winning.

They’re still thinking critically.

They’re still demonstrating their knowledge and understanding.

They’re still strengthening their oral communication skills.

They’re still reflecting on their learning.

My students don’t receive points or percentages for anything they do, so I hardly ever hear “Is this for marks?” or “Will this be graded?”

For the most part, they just do it. Because that’s the culture we’ve built.

And I sleep with the satisfaction of knowing they are moving their own learning forward.

Learning can happen without us, not to mention the possibilities afforded by peer- and self-assessment. Sometimes we need to drop the hero complex and remember that the children in our care have the capacity to learn and grow on their own.

Even if we don’t always see their finished product? (Gasp.)

Yes.

That’s not an abdication. It’s a recognition of student agency.

Dig it or ditch it? The final verdict on video representations of learning.

I’ve shown you the magic.

I’ve detailed the misery of the time it takes to actually review every video submission.

And I’ve assured you that by opening the door to these representations of learning, you’re not actually kissing your sanity goodbye.

So I say dig it.

Offer feedback and coaching in the moment. Offer likes and encouragement whenever you can. Grade work and provide assessment when you must.

Don’t drive yourself crazy, but take this tool out of the toolbox.

What happens next just might bring back some of your fire for learning.

And your community will be better for it.

How I Learned a Lesson About Student Privacy

I thought I had done such a great job of communicating with her parents.

Image Source: https://unsplash.com/@alexisrbrown

It was an 8th grade English class in a previous teaching context. Students were engaged in a collaborative writing activity in Google Docs, working in small table groups around the room.

I like to make learning visible whenever possible. While students worked, I began cycling through their various Google Docs on the big screen, adding real-time affirmations and encouragement when and where I could.

I did this for a few groups and was pleased with what I saw. So far so good.

Then I moved to another group’s Doc. They were writing, all right. But soon I could see that something was amiss.

One of my writers hadn’t yet caught on to the fact that his group’s work was now featured live on the big screen for all to see. And — not a shock for 8th graders — I could see that his writing wasn’t exactly on task.

Instead, he was trying to draw laughs from his writing partners. To my horror, I watched in real time as he typed something disrespectful about one of his female classmates who was in the room and working with another group. The comment was crude and inappropriate.

I switched quickly away from his Doc, but not quite quickly enough. A couple of classmates had seen his classless composition, and their reaction was loud. I felt angry and disappointed and sad all at once.

Time to craft those parent emails

Once the dust had settled and students were all home for the day, I set to work on writing emails home to parents. I wanted to address this issue quickly and head on, especially with the parents of the female student (who I expected would likely hear about it from their daughter). Nip it in the bud, as they say.

I wanted her parents to hear that they could count on me and our staff team to make sure that our school was a safe place for their daughter. That she was known, loved, and appreciated in our learning community. That we wouldn’t tolerate acts of aggression or sexual harassment in our classrooms.

And so I gave her parents a clear summary of what had happened along with a few thoughts and commitments regarding my next restorative steps. I felt good about my wording and made sure to BCC my principal.

I re-read the email to make sure I had avoided grammar errors and I was representing myself professionally.

Send.

There’s just one small issue

The next morning, my principal was his usual encouraging self. At first.

“Great email, Tim. Your communication was professional as always. There’s just one small issue.”

Uh oh.

He went on to kindly explain where I had gone off track. The parents of the female student in my classroom didn’t need to know the name of the student who had harassed her, he pointed out.

My mind raced. I had considered the privacy angle when I wrote the email but had decided to go ahead and name her aggressor. After all, their daughter would obviously name the boy involved, right?

If anything, my naming of him would signal to her parents that I wasn’t going to tiptoe around this issue. It would show them that I was serious about calling it like it was and following up firmly. Or so I thought.

There were a couple of problems in my thinking there.

For one thing, we never know exactly what our students will or will not tell their parents. My student may have shared the name of the other student, or she may not have. Frankly — and in the form of many middle schoolers — it was possible that she may not have even mentioned the incident at all.

But really, what my student communicated to her parents is beside the point. Because that’s her business. It’s between her and her family.

What is my business as an education professional is what I communicate with the parents of my students. And here, my principal made a critical point for me that I have never forgotten.

The parents of my students should NEVER learn about the misbehavior of other (identified) students from me.

Some privacy advocates will jump in here to take this rule even further. They’ll say that parents should never learn ANY information about other students from their teacher, but I’m not so sure. I can think of contexts where this may be appropriate. Imagine a class newsletter that celebrates the successes of group science projects, for example.

But all it takes is putting your parent hat on for one minute in order to quickly grasp the problem that occurs when a teacher overshares information about student misbehavior.

How would you feel if it was your child that was being reported on?

Speaking as a parent myself, I know I wouldn’t be thrilled. Some other parents out there are hearing a report with specific details about my son? Without the knowledge of his parents or an opportunity for us to see or hear this version of the facts?

Nope, not cool. Not cool at all.

When you really think about it, this kind of communication is completely unnecessary. It has basically zero chance of helping anything and instead has the dangerous potential to mushroom into other problems.

Just imagine parents of students in your class engaging in an unofficial WhatsApp chat (lots of those in my current school community) that gets into the topic of a recent behavior incident that occurred at school. One parent tries to helpfully clarify details of the event and leads with “Actually, I heard from Mr. Cavey that Johnny did X, Y, and Z.”

Yikes. That’s not going to end well for me.

It’s best practice and protects everyone involved.

I’m thankful that my principal had the courage to share this lesson with me. It’s one that I’ve never forgotten, and I pass it on whenever I can.

Yes, in some cases it will take a little more work to craft emails about school incidents that are rife with mentions of “a classmate” or “another student.” It makes the wording super awkward in some cases.

But that’s how it needs to be for all concerned.

We have a duty of care to our students, and part of that professional duty compels us to protect the reputation of each child. When we discuss student misbehavior incidents in the staff room, we take care not to name the students involved. Other teachers don’t need to know.

The same thing applies to our email and phone communications with parents. They don’t need to know the names of other students involved. And if gossip does come to their ears, we sleep easy knowing that it didn’t come from us.

Of course, the other win here is that by following this practice of privacy, you’re actually protecting yourself. When you name other students and describe their misbehavior to adults who are not their parents, you’re not just risking the trust that parents place in you. You’re inviting accusations of slander.

Do yourself a favor and abstain.

Thank you, teacher, for doing the hard work of carefully communicating important developments with the parents of your students. Keeping families well-informed is such a critical piece of the school-family relationship and it is deeply appreciated. It takes time, care, and energy.

Years ago, I messed up and overshared. That’s unfortunate.

But learn from my mistake, fellow educator. Protect your students and protect yourself. Your community will be safer, happier, and healthier for it.

Let’s keep that fire for learning burning bright.