• 3 Ways to Build Demanding Writing Tasks for Students in the Age of AI

    , ,
    , ,

    To produce reliable evidence of student learning, we need to evolve.

    Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT have disrupted the state of K-12 education.

    Perhaps disrupted is an understatement.

    Let’s be real. These tools have dropped an atomic bomb on teaching and learning norms around the world.

    Teachers of middle and high school students are suddenly asking how on earth they can be asked to create meaningful writing tasks that cannot be fulfilled by AI tools.

    “Summarize Three Important Moments in the Career of George Washington” is no longer suitable, although one could argue that it hasn’t been suitable for quite some time.

    Even next-level thinking tasks like “Compare and contrast the political ideologies of Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau” are now well within the reach of AI capabilities.

    The same goes for “Summarize the three most common ethical objections to stem cell research” or “Write a Shakespearean sonnet about a current political movement.”

    All of these prompts are fairly easy for AI tools to tackle in seconds.

    So how do we push student writing and thinking in ways that assure the significance of the produced work?

    How can we elicit writing that can actually be considered reliable evidence of learning against curricular standards?

    3 Ways to Build Demanding Writing Tasks for Students in the Age of AI

    1. Personalize

    The first approach I suggest we take with our writing tasks is personalization. Here’s what I mean.

    Require students to establish authentic connections and personal positions with the text or concepts being considered. Whether it’s a political figure, a set of ideologies, an ethical issue in biology, or a creative work in English, elicit more I-statements, opinions, and connections with personal experiences or beliefs.

    So instead of …

    “Describe the evolution of Ponyboy in The Outsiders, connecting changes in his character to important moments in the plot,”

    we can take that to the next level with …

    “Describe the evolution of Ponyboy in The Outsiders, comparing key moments from his journey with your own story of personal development.”

    Or instead of …

    “Compare and contrast the political ideologies of Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau,”

    we can personalize that with …

    “Compare and contrast the political ideologies of Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau with your own views. Which ideologies do you support, and which do you oppose? Justify each of your positions.”

    Sure, perhaps limited aspects of the latter are ChatGPT-able, but this kind of persistent personalization pulls students away from trite copy and paste actions. It requires learners to use I-messages and stake their claims to personal viewpoints.

    And that requires critical thinking.

    I-messages are everything here. We need to invite students to write in the first person as often as possible.

    2. Localize

    The second angle I suggest taking is localization. This is more challenging than personalization, but I think it has the potential to help. What we want to do here is to challenge AI tools like ChatGPT by building writing tasks that relate to specific local, micro environments.

    I work in a large city, so it may be well within ChatGPT’s reach to speak about my city with authority. But as smart as they are, the AI clones have a much tougher time with smaller municipalities, regions, and neighborhoods.

    Let’s start with something general and Google-able, like this: How does suburban growth and development affect raccoon populations?

    Source: ChatGPT 3.5

    No problem. Like I said, this is Google-able.

    But can ChatGPT speak to raccoon population trends occurring in one specific municipality?

    Source: ChatGPT 3.5

    No, it can’t. It can’t find (or hasn’t yet scraped) the data — something it subtly sidesteps before launching into a boilerplate listicle of factors that affect raccoon population trends in suburban areas, generally speaking.

    What’s my point here?

    Simply that the more we localize the demands of our writing tasks, the less useful AI tools become, and the more our students will need to rely on primary research, investigative journalism, and good old-fashioned critical thinking.

    “What do we do when ChatGPT doesn’t know the answer?”

    I’m so glad you asked, young learner.

    Let’s think about this.

    Image Source: Canva stock library

    3. Vocalize

    Vocalization is the icing on the cake. We take our writing tasks to yet another level of quality and evidence of mastery by asking our students to vocalize their texts.

    Present their works to the class.

    Share them in small groups.

    Read single paragraphs aloud in sharing circles.

    Require students to engage with their texts and the texts of others in dynamic ways (think, pair, share around ideas or passages, for example).

    Record portions or whole pieces (in audio or video format) of texts presented aloud to be shared with the broader learning community as podcasts, online learning portfolios, or on YouTube.

    Yes, part of what we’re doing here is building in accountability: students who rip off entire essays from ChatGPT risk being exposed when they stumble over words, expressions, and core concepts from the very texts that they pretend to have written themselves.

    But this isn’t a game of entrapment. That’s a loser’s game, and if that’s all we’re doing, the message we’re effectively sending is You’re going to have to try harder and work smarter in order to avoid being caught.

    What we’re actually more interested in is leaning into one of the great principles of learning.

    We’re seizing the moment to invite our students into higher order thinking and knowing.

    What our students can discuss with confidence is what they deeply understand.

    Final thoughts

    In the age of AI, it can be tempting to feel like we’re on the defensive as educators.

    It’s us against the machines. Students against academic integrity. Suddenly, we’re battling plagiarism and fabrication on a whole new level, and it can feel like we’re losing.

    There’s a different mindset to take here.

    ChatGPT and its allies have disrupted the world of learning, yes. But look what’s happening.

    It’s forcing us to ask more from our learners.

    More imagination.

    More authentic voice.

    More critical thinking.

    More investigation and inquiry.

    As we require students to personalize, localize, and vocalize their learning, the evidence of learning that we’re after takes clearer shape.

    And that’s no deep fake.

  • How Ryan Howard Exposed Traditional Assessment Practices

    ,
    ,

    “I’d be stupid not to do it. Right?”

    One of the greatest episodes from The Office — indisputably the funniest sitcom ever created — has a detail buried in it that says something profound about traditional assessment paradigms.

    The episode, of course, features Michael Scott (Ryan’s office manager) as guest speaker for Ryan’s business school class. True to form, Michael launches into a confidently delivered but basically nonsensical lecture on what he considers the essential principles of business.

    “There are four kinds of businesses,” he rants in front of a full college classroom. “Tourism, food service, railroads, and sales.”

    Watching Ryan sit there mortified through it all is side-splitting stuff.

    But the detail I find most significant in terms of our professional teaching practice is a quote that comes from Ryan early on in the episode, as he explains to the “documentary” film crew why he invited Michael to speak to his college business class in the first place.

    “If you bring your boss to class, it automatically bumps you up a full letter grade. So … I’d be stupid not to do it, right?”

    Of course, the comedic factor enjoyed by Office fans here is the knowledge that giving Michael this kind of stage is a recipe for disaster.

    It’s a terrible deal, Ryan. Don’t do it!

    But what most viewers miss is the ridiculous proposition made by the professor. Bring in someone from your work, and your grade goes up by a full letter.

    What?

    Looks like grades have more to do with hoops and compliance than actual abilities or skills in this course.

    But of course Ryan isn’t objecting. He’s taking the invitation and playing along, because this is the system of assessment that America has accepted.

    The traditional grades-as-wages paradigm

    In traditional paradigms of assessment, grades aren’t necessarily about learning or evidence of proficiency. They’re as much about pleasing the person at the front of the room.

    Grades are really just wages. Currency.

    Do what I want, and you get paid, maybe even rewarded with a pay bonus.

    Don’t do what I want, and you won’t get paid. Misbehave, and you’ll actually be fined.

    I’ve seen a teacher offer students a percentage increase in their overall average in exchange for tidying up classroom shelves.

    I’ve seen a band teacher require students to clean up chairs and equipment after a concert under threat of lost grades.

    In possibly the funniest example ever, a veteran colleague recounted to me how when she was in high school, her PE teacher would award bonus points to students who had showers after PE classes.

    Weird. And a little creepy.

    The saddest part of all of this is that like Ryan Howard, the students caught up in the middle of these arrangements generally accept them.

    They’ve been conditioned to do so. They’ve learned that education is really just a big game to understand, a set of hoops to jump through, a case of pleasing and impressing the right people.

    I once asked a class of 8th graders which they would value more: a straight-A report card or more learning? Results were split.

    Friends. School is about learning. Assessments should support the learning — not the other way around.

    Every bit of assessment we collect, document, share, and report should reflect student learning against curricular standards. Nothing else.

    When we hold up grades as wages to be paid to students, we’re leveraging our gradebooks for compliance and making up our own weird version of education.

    How do I feel about that?

    Well, in the words of Michael Scott, “I don’t hate it. I just don’t like it at all and it’s terrible.”

  • How to Respond to AI-Powered Cheating in the Middle Years

    , , , ,
    , , , ,

    Let’s think this through before throwing the book at middle school students.

    Most teachers remember the conversation around plagiarism and academic dishonesty in their undergraduate programs in college or university.

    The vibe was intense.

    Try it, get caught, and you could suffer serious academic penalties.

    You could fail your course. Be removed from your degree program. Get kicked out of school entirely.

    This was heavy, heavy stuff. Still is.

    And it’s fresh on the minds of most teachers when they enter their K-12 classrooms.

    Academic dishonesty in the 2000s

    I’ve taught in the middle years for over 20 years. When I started teaching in 2001, wifi wasn’t a thing.

    That gives you a sense of how things have evolved in the years since.

    I remember when the internet finally arrived in our computer lab via LAN connections and we started to see the first clumsy attempts at academic dishonesty. Students were learning — like all of us — about the power of copy and paste.

    Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V.

    Magic. Could writing actually become this easy?

    All the text jumped from some wonky website right into that 8th grade Social Studies essay with a few flourishes of the mouse and a couple of keystrokes.

    So simple. Just hit that print command and let the noisy beast of a bubble jet printer do its work.

    Of course, students in 2010 hadn’t quite figured out that their copying and pasting was leaving obvious tell-tale signs.

    Unusual font styles and sizes were giving them away. Even funnier, source URLs were sometimes left directly in the text of essays or appeared elsewhere on the page, especially if they dared to print their “essay” straight from another website.

    Thoughtful conversations followed such missteps.

    Academic dishonesty in the age of Chat GPT

    Fast forward to 2023 and the explosion in AI that we’ve all witnessed this year. Chat GPT and its clones have disrupted the technology landscape and redefined possibilities for composition.

    Suddenly, it’s easier than ever to generate large bodies of text and claim authorship. For some students in grades five through nine, let’s say, the thought must be incredibly tantalizing.

    These learners are digital natives, yes, but they’re also building new digital literacy skills.

    • They’re still new to email and appropriate email communication.
    • They’re new to task lists and calendars and cloud drive organization.
    • They’re new to academic research and appropriate citation.
    • And they’re still learning to formulate positions and justify arguments in clear, coherent, compelling ways.

    They haven’t been at any of it for long, but they’re fearless. They’re ready to play and experiment.

    They’re ready to be serious and fun and industrious and goofy and persuasive and inappropriate all in one day.

    So we should expect them to try some moves with AI writing tools.

    How to respond when middle years students turn in work created (maybe) by artificial intelligence

    You’ll notice that I keep mentioning middle years. That’s intentional.

    When it comes to seniors in 12th grade, for example, I recognize that the stakes are higher.

    Those learners should also have a little more perspective, a little more awareness, a little more responsibility to own when it comes to academic honesty and originality of thought.

    But when it comes to students in the middle years, I’m thinking of kids between the ages of 10–15 who in many cases have not had computers at their desks for long.

    In my context, students don’t move to 1:1 Chromebooks until sixth grade. Their use of computers and iPads before that is rare and intermittent.

    As I mentioned, they’re still in the thick of digital literacy skill acquisition.

    With that in mind, I think it’s possible to over-respond when it comes to instances of AI-powered cheating. Frankly, “cheating” may not even be the right term in a lot of cases.

    When a 12-year-old uses an AI tool to produce (or heavily supplement) an academic piece and then claim the work as entirely their own, my reaction is NOT “Oh my God, how could this happen?”

    Not at all. I fully expect it to happen.

    I mean, wouldn’t we be naive not to?

    No, I’m not scheduling a serious meeting with this student and the principal. I’m not contacting the child’s parents with a heavy-sounding email (not in the first instance, at least).

    I’m not pursuing a heavy consequence, suspension, failure, or a zero on the assignment.

    I may make colleagues aware of what has happened in a casual, helpful sense, but I’m not putting out an all-caps distress call.

    Instead, I’m going to approach the situation as an act of curiosity and experimentation.

    Instead of horror, I’m going to enjoy the conversation that follows.

    This is not advocating for plagiarism

    I was thinking through some of this stuff out loud on X.com when Barbara shared this reply.

    If what you’re hearing is me “advocating for plagiarism,” I think you’re missing my point here.

    What I’m calling for here is a bit of a change in approach when it comes to students who are 10–15 years of age.

    We know these kids.

    We know their developmental traits.

    We know they are experimental and risk-embracing.

    We know they are playing with alter-egos and unsavory online activities, in many cases.

    These students lack the maturity, perspective, judgment, and experience of their older peers.

    So what I’m calling for is not about ‘going soft’ or ‘letting cheating go.’ Not at all. In fact, while we’re talking about punitive measures, I’d be the first to say that chronic offenders require very different responses.

    But when it comes to our first-time offenders, our experimenters, our ill-advised Chat GPTers, I’d suggest proceeding with calm and thoughtful care.

    Instead of throwing the book (or the computer?) at these students or initiating large-scale investigations, let’s engage in thoughtful conversations.

    Conversations that might sound like …

    • “Hey, I like what you wrote here. Can you tell me about your writing process?”
    • “This is good stuff, my friend. Can you tell me a little more about your argument here in the third paragraph?”
    • “Great work on your persuasive essay. It looks like you may need to cite your sources, though. Do you think you can do that and then re-submit?”

    These are gentle, open-ended questions that nudge and prod around the edges of your suspicions. They’re curious. They sound like learning partnership, not lead attorney for the prosecution.

    They strike an entirely different posture than “Did you or did you not use Chat GPT for this?”

    Assessment means to sit beside

    Hey, it’s possible that our middle schooler in question may not be entirely honest about the role of AI in their writing process. They may offer a few lies to cover their tracks.

    In the short term, that’s not such a huge deal. Keep your relationship with this student strong and move on. There will be plenty of other learning opportunities to come.

    I find it a little puzzling when I hear teachers express their hell-bent commitment to prevent a student from “getting away with this.”

    I mean, take a deep breath, my friend. Mikey hasn’t stolen money from your safe deposit box. It’s simply possible that not all of this writing was actually his.

    Again, I’m not diminishing the seriousness of cheating. What I’m saying is that this is not the time to call in the cavalry. The sky is not falling in here.

    What it actually IS time for is to do more sitting with this student. And by that I mean literally sitting with him.

    Support him, encourage him, coach him through his writing process.

    After all, what’s our goal for this student?

    It’s to help him meet learning targets or curricular standards.

    It’s to help him become a better writer and communicator.

    It’s to help him learn.

    May I humbly suggest that jumping to angry accusations, threatening a zero, or conducting large-scale investigations regarding did he or did he not cheat on this essay has the potential to be a lose-lose situation.

    Nobody’s winning here.

    Instead, focus on more partnership. More presence. More coaching. More real-time observation.

    Do that, and I think we’ll all get the results that we want — teacher and student.

    It’s a brave new artificial world out there.

    Let’s learn together.

  • How to Launch An Education Podcast: My Best Advice

    , ,
    , ,

    Eleven tips that will help you build your voice and amplify your impact.

    Image Source: Soundtrap on Unsplash

    I first launched the Teachers on Fire podcast in 2018. It’s been an awesome ride, and I’ve learned a LOT over the journey.

    Five years later, much of my creative energy and focus has shifted to YouTube. But recently, I’ve returned to publishing weekly episodes on the podcast as well.

    Podcasting ignites my fire a little more every time I hit that publish button. There’s so much that is beautiful and powerful, simple yet compelling about this audio-only medium.

    My podcast journey got off to a rough start

    The start of my podcasting journey was comically ugly. Very, very ugly.

    I cringe and laugh when I think about trying to record my first interview through an app that crashed five or six times throughout our conversation.

    What should have been a 20-minute conversation took about an hour. Fortunately, I had a very patient and accommodating guest for my first episode of all time.

    I was so wildly sold on the principles of growth mindset and incremental progress at the time that I could take any adversity. Things can only get better from here, I thought often. And I was right.

    Two hundred thirty-four episodes and over 279,000 downloads later, I’ve learned a thing or two about podcasting. Although the media landscape looks different than it did five years ago, podcasting is still an incredibly effective way to share your message.

    If you’re looking to launch your own education podcast, I’ve got some suggestions.

    My best advice for launching your own education podcast

    1. Define your mission, vision, target audience, and value proposition.

    Take an hour and write out clear answers to the questions below. These thoughts will form your compass and your decision filter for the life of your podcast, even if some of your ideas evolve over time.

    • Who is your target audience?
    • What’s your value proposition?
    • How will listeners benefit by listening to your content?

    2. Based on those answers, select a title for your podcast.

    This is a critical step, so think it through very carefully and follow these tips:

    a. Select a title that has available real estate (handles) on ALL the social media platforms.

    For example, I made sure that @TeachersOnFire was available for the taking on virtually every social media platform — in the podcast community, of course, but also on X, Instagram, and Facebook. Exact same spelling, same characters, same order everywhere.

    The standardized handles will make promotion and publication infinitely simpler as you get out the word about your work. Believe me – you’ll thank me later.

    b. Select a title that makes your podcast findable by educators who are simply browsing podcasts.

    This is called SEO, or search engine optimization. If you can find a way to have something about teaching or teachers or learning or schools or education in your podcast title, there’s a legitimate chance that teachers will find and follow your podcast simply based on their own searches in Google or on podcast platforms.

    That scenario is a lot less likely if your podcast title is something weird like The Mystery or vague like Important Conversations.

    c. Select a title that is simple, easy to understand, easy to remember, easy to find.

    Here’s a practical test: if the name is based on some clever pun or it’s vague or confusing or has an unusual spelling or has to be explained in any way for people every time you mention it, it’s a fail.

    Don’t fall for the temptation to make an E a 3 or something weird like that. You’ll be forever explaining, clarifying, and reminding puzzled friends or connections who are trying to find your work.

    d. Don’t select a title that someone else is already using in another space.

    This might seem obvious, but take the time to Google your podcast title. If someone somewhere is using that title for something else, you’ll be competing with that organization for search traffic.

    Early in my podcast journey I discovered a new website called Teachers on Fire that was being used by a group of Jewish rabbis in California.

    Fortunately, I think they’ve moved on from the name and the site, but you can imagine how that conflict would create problems for both of us as we each continued to grow larger. Our audiences and communities would be landing on each other’s content all the time. Frustration both ways.

    3. Choose a podcast host.

    I went with Anchor which later became Spotify for Podcasters. It was free for me at the time and still is, even after the Spotify acquisition.

    Once my sound file is uploaded to Spotify for Podcasters, it distributes my podcast to all the other podcast players (Apple Podcasts, Breaker, Castro, Pocket Casts, Spreaker, etc.) automatically.

    A huge time-saver. Did I mention it’s free?

    4. Hit record before you feel fully ready.

    Do not allow analysis paralysis to take over. You’ll never be fully ready, and your first episodes won’t be perfect.

    But you’ll learn SO MUCH from experience.

    Everything will feel slow and cumbersome at first, but you’ll learn something new every single episode and your content will slowly get better with reps.

    So do it. Hit record. Then hit publish. Get this train moving.

    Don’t overthink equipment — a $50 mic is all you need to get going.

    5. Don’t judge the success of your venture until you’re 100 episodes in.

    This was a piece of advice that I first heard on The Fizzle Show podcast and it stuck with me.

    Give yourself 100 episodes.

    Most would-be podcasters quit by episode 10 (the term for this is podfade), which is no time at all to earn visibility and loyalty.

    Give yourself a proper chance before you return a verdict on whether to continue or let it die.

    6. Interviews will grow your podcast infinitely faster than solo episodes, so go that way if possible.

    Every time you interview a guest, they share your content with their social network. This gives you amazing exposure to your target audience and puts your growth on steroids (compared to solo content).

    When you interview guests, your thinking will be pushed and stretched in ways that just can’t happen with solo content. You’ll learn a ton, and other creators will give you invaluable advice that you never knew to ask for. You’ll also build meaningful new relationships that will last for years to come.

    7. If you decide to adopt an interview format, use a video conference platform to record your episodes.

    One of COVID’s few blessings was that it made Zoom ubiquitous. Everyone has it and knows how to use it.

    The audio quality on Zoom is decent, especially if users actually have professional microphones at hand. But laptop internal mics have come a long way in the last ten years. If that’s all your guest is using, it’ll probably be fine.

    Other quality video platform recorders out there include Zencastr, Riverside, and a great video livestreaming platform called StreamYard (I use this one regularly).

    You get a couple of nice wins from using a video conferencing platform to record your interview content.

    One is that the benefit of body language allows you to establish more of a multidimensional connection with your guest — it’s a little warmer than an audio-only conversation.

    The other benefit is that the video file it produces actually allows you to publish your conversation as a video on YouTube, too.

    8. Use Adobe Audition for editing.

    Use it for your recording as well, if you decide to go with solo content on your podcast at first.

    Adobe Audition takes time to learn, but it’s super powerful. It allows you to filter out unwanted background noise and it can make voice audio sound rich and deep even if it wasn’t recorded that way.

    If your school has an Adobe subscription, you likely have free access to Audition.

    But there are plenty of simpler options in this space as well. For example, if you happen to be a Mac person, you probably already have access to Garage Band.

    9. Try to publish consistently.

    This is very hard for full-time educators.

    But listeners generally like knowing when to expect new content from you. If you can maintain a weekly schedule, that’s the gold standard.

    You’ll build loyalty and relationships with listeners that just won’t happen when your content is unpredictable.

    10. Post your audio-only files on YouTube.

    You might be thinking to yourself, Tim, I’m not talking about becoming a YouTuber here.

    Trust me. I posted all my early podcast content onto YouTube as audio-only files — never expecting them to get much traction. But weirdly enough, they did.

    Many of those audio-only episodes got hundreds of views (listens) in the months and years that followed. Thanks in large part to the incremental growth from those early episodes, my channel is monetized today.

    That means that it’s spinning off modest monthly income, supporting my creative work, and giving me another way to share my voice. That’s super cool.

    What have you got to lose?

    11. Engage in the online communities where your target audience lives.

    I’m not talking here about creating social media accounts just so that you can hop in once a week and dump a link to your latest episode. All the social media platforms hate that and are now wired to suppress that sort of spammy content. You’d be wasting your time.

    None of us have time to put hours into each and every platform, so give yourself some grace when it comes to what I’m about to say next.

    Invest in online relationships. Connect with other educators who share your passionate ideals for growth and change in education. Provide value in online communities and you’ll be building trust and visibility for your name and brand.

    There’s absolutely no way that I could have grown Teachers on Fire to what it is today without X (then Twitter). I can’t say enough about my friends and colleagues there who have cheered me on and supported my work over the years.

    The fact is that not many listeners will find you by accident. Some will, because you followed my advice and titled your podcast in a way that’s findable and search-friendly. But it won’t be many.

    The sad truth is that content creators who are not on any social media platforms struggle along in relative obscurity for months and years because literally no one knows they exist.

    That’s just the harsh truth. It’s the way online content works. You have to get in front of eyeballs — not wait for them to find you.

    So get out there. Champion your values. Get connected on X. Find Facebook groups of educators that align with your vision for education. Find other creators on Instagram or TikTok or LinkedIn who are doing the work you’re doing and can support and inspire you along the way.

    Support the work and messages of others, and they’ll be inclined to support you back.

    Final thoughts

    I’m so excited that you’re starting this journey, fellow educator.

    I remember when Adam Welcome told me that every educator should have a podcast. I’d go light on the should there, but his point is well-taken.

    The field of K-12 education needs more inspiring, positive, practical podcast content, and I know you’re ready to provide just that.

    Let me know how I can help and reach out any time.

    I’ll be cheering you on.

  • Create Quizzes from YouTube Videos Automatically with Quizizz

    , , ,
    , , ,

    It just got a whole lot easier to check student comprehension of video content. But does this feature actually support student learning?

    *Note: I have no affiliation with Quizizz.

    Education technology has been quiet for a while, it feels like. But something pretty exciting has appeared in the online quiz game space.

    Online quiz platforms have come a long way

    First, let’s zoom out and give this category of education apps some context.

    The iconic Kahoot first appeared in 2013. Can you believe that?

    Since then, it feels like it’s ruled the review quiz space, by and large.

    Everyone knows Kahoot.

    But other apps and companies have also appeared over the years, and each one boasts interesting features that the others do not. Even as Kahoot slowly evolves forward and adds its own features, teachers can now choose from Blooket, Gimkit, Quizizz, or Quizlet.

    I can’t profess to be a high-level expert on the ins and outs of every platform. A side-by-side comparison of each one (including differences between free and premium plans) would be fun.

    Perhaps edtech author, speaker, and podcaster Jake Miller could tackle that little project. Jake?

    New from Quizizz: AI-created quizzes from selected YouTube videos

    In the meantime, I can tell you this.

    Quizizz is putting artificial intelligence to work for teachers.

    Quizizz now allows teachers to create review quizzes automatically from any YouTube video (provided it has captions, including auto-captions, which most videos do).

    Drop the YouTube link and watch Quizizz do its magic.

    Wow.

    But Quizizz isn’t done.

    It can also apply the same quiz-making skills to any .PDF, .Doc, or .PPT file.

    Want to paste in a big body of text?

    No problem. It can do that, too.

    For FREE. As of the time of writing, you could perform this magic from a Basic account.

    Time to test this YouTube-video-to-automatic-quiz feature out

    I was skeptical at first. There’s no way this can work quickly and well, I thought.

    Turns out it can.

    I tested Quizizz on two YouTube videos. The first video was from fifth grade Social Studies, related to the government structures. The second was from sixth grade Science, related to Isaac Newton’s three laws of motion.

    Both were short videos (under three minutes), so I knew the Quizizz AI wasn’t getting a huge amount of text from which to formulate questions.

    It didn’t struggle at all. Ten decent multiple choice questions and answers for each video.

    But does this feature actually support student learning?

    Hold on, Cavey. Let’s make sure we’re not just rushing after the latest shiny object.

    All-important is this question: does this app or feature support student learning? If so, how?

    I think it does, although not in profoundly significant ways. Here’s what I mean.

    Let’s take the second video that I tested in Quizizz — Newton’s Laws of Motion (Motion, Force, Acceleration).

    I might show that video in connection with a learning target (derived from our sixth grade Science curriculum) that looked like this:

    🎯 I can define and identify Newton’s three laws of motion.

    Quizizz had no problem spitting out 10 decent multiple choice questions based on this short video (2:37). Bravo!

    But let’s talk about depth of knowledge for a second. Even if a student scored a 10/10 on my little quiz (and note that I don’t record any numbers in my gradebook whatsoever), would I consider that evidence of full proficiency?

    I’m not so sure that I would.

    I would want more evidence. Better quality evidence. Other kinds of representations of this learning that require a little more from the learner and demonstrate greater depth of knowledge.

    The same goes for all of these review platforms. We don’t take student results from Blooket or Kahoot and throw them in our gradebook. Right?

    Hmmm.

    Three nice wins from this feature

    Here’s where I think these AI-powered features really add to the teaching and learning experience.

    1. They will give teachers another source of formative assessment.

    Wondering if your students are grasping the basics of Newton’s three laws? Your quiz results will give you a decent signal.

    Will student scores give you a rock-solid picture of the depth of their understanding? As I wrote above, no. Will they help? Yes, particularly on a macro (whole-class) level.

    2. They will increase student engagement.

    It’s my anecdotal observation of middle schoolers that when multiple choice quizzes come out, most students come to play.

    They’re engaged. They’re focused. They’re aiming to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding.

    And because of that fact, I know I’ll also get higher engagement when I show the video itself. Simply by saying with a smile “And I’ve got a 10-question quiz to follow, so pay close attention!” I know students will be more engaged.

    Am I leveraging performance anxiety to increase engagement? I don’t think so. I mean, I don’t even record numbers in my gradebooks. None at all.

    And it should go without saying that I’m not going to embarrass or humiliate a student for a poor showing.

    All I’m trying to do here is press a little button that says I care about your comprehension of this material, and because I care, I’d like to see some evidence.

    That knowledge alone is enough to activate more attention and interest in most students.

    3. They will save teachers time.

    In 2023, teacher sustainability is everything. Seriously.

    As we ask more from teachers than ever before, we have to have to have to find ways to save teachers time and energy.

    This feature is one way to do it. A year ago, it probably took your average teacher 20–30 minutes to make a review quiz on one of these platforms.

    No more. Powered by some awesome AI, Quizizz will do it for teachers in a matter of seconds. That’s a welcome savings.

    Final thoughts on Quizizz AI

    I’m excited about this step forward for review games, and I’m 95% sure it’s not just the nerdy technophile side of me speaking.

    These quizzes will save teachers time, increase student engagement, and give teachers another source of formative assessment that will guide their next instructional decisions.

    And it’s FREE. Did I mention that?

    If you’re new to Quizizz but want to give it a try, check my latest edtech tutorial.